Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
2026
Pages: -
Research paper
Assessment, rehabilitation and reconstruction
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 1
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Research paper Assessment, rehabilitation and reconstruction

APPLICATION OF THE JAPANESE JBDPA METHODOLOGY FOR THE SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS

By
Marija Vitanova Orcid logo ,
Marija Vitanova
Contact Marija Vitanova

Risk, Disaster Management and Strategic Planning, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Marija Vitanova , Skopje , North Macedonia

Goran Jekic
Goran Jekic

Building Structures and Materials: Design, Analysis and Testing, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje North Macedonia

Abstract

The seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is a critical concern, especially for structures designed prior to the implementation of modern seismic design provisions. This paper presents the Japanese JBDPA Standard (2001) as a comprehensive framework for the seismic assessment of existing RC buildings. The methodology employs a three-level screening procedure to calculate the Seismic Index of Structure, which is subsequently compared with the required Seismic Demand Index to evaluate structural safety. The assessment incorporates member strength, ductility, structural irregularities, and time-related deterioration effects. Particular attention is given to the calculation of the principal evaluation indices and the criteria used for seismic safety judgment.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read
See all >
Latest
See all >
Citations
Crossref Logo

0