Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
2026
Pages: -
Professional paper
Design and execution of structures
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 3
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Professional paper Design and execution of structures

STATIC TENSILE FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF THE OVM.ST15-47 PARALLEL-STRAND HANGER SYSTEM FOR THE NEW SAVA BRIDGE IN BELGRADE, SERBIA

By
Božidar Furundžić
Božidar Furundžić
Contact Božidar Furundžić

QA/QC, Quality Control Engineer, CPM Consulting , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

This paper presents the full-scale static tensile factory acceptance testing of the OVM.ST15-47 parallel-strand hanger system intended for installation on the New Sava Bridge in Belgrade, Serbia. Each tested hanger assembly consisted of 47 seven-wire prestressing strands, with a nominal tensile strength of 1,860 MPa and a nominal cross-sectional area of 150 mm² per strand, together with the associated anchorage and fork components. Two representative full-scale hanger specimens were subjected to a predefined staged loading procedure, including a 60-minute load-holding period at 0.8 of the guaranteed ultimate tensile strength (GUTS), followed by loading to the governing acceptance force. The required acceptance force was defined as the greater of 95% GUTS and 92% of the calculated actual ultimate tensile strength (AUTS) of the 47-strand bundle. Both specimens exceeded the governing force and minimum elongation requirements. No damage to specimens and no failure of anchorage-system components were observed after the loading procedure. The results demonstrate that both tested hanger assemblies satisfied the specified static tensile acceptance criteria.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read
See all >
Latest
See all >
Citations
Crossref Logo

0